<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Assessment on Eric Lin</title><link>https://ericxlin.io/tags/assessment/</link><description>Recent content in Assessment on Eric Lin</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://ericxlin.io/tags/assessment/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Grades are not prices</title><link>https://ericxlin.io/blog/grades-are-not-prices/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://ericxlin.io/blog/grades-are-not-prices/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In a recent &lt;a href="https://www.econtalk.org/how-better-feedback-can-revolutionize-education-with-daisy-christodoulou/"&gt;&lt;em&gt;EconTalk&lt;/em&gt; episode&lt;/a&gt;, Daisy Christodoulou explored the challenges of educational assessment, drawing provocative parallels between grades and prices. She suggested that grades, like prices in a market, help allocate attention, shape incentives, and guide decisions. It&amp;rsquo;s a striking analogy—and one that resonates with the broader themes of the episode, which reflected deeply on tradeoffs, transparency, and the limitations of rule-based systems. But as I sat with the idea, I found myself questioning whether the price metaphor truly captures what grades are—or what we need them to be. This essay is a reflection on that metaphor, and an argument for thinking about grades and educational feedback in a different way.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>